From 49a320aaa6fb4c20d6b30c56c35a8c7ffceed822 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars-Dominik Braun Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 10:09:44 +0100 Subject: Upgrade Haskell packages. Script-aided bulk change. --- .../cabal-install-base16-bytestring1.0.patch | 29 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 29 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/cabal-install-base16-bytestring1.0.patch (limited to 'gnu/packages/patches/cabal-install-base16-bytestring1.0.patch') diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/cabal-install-base16-bytestring1.0.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/cabal-install-base16-bytestring1.0.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 998bf08718..0000000000 --- a/gnu/packages/patches/cabal-install-base16-bytestring1.0.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,29 +0,0 @@ -Restore compatibility with newer version of base16-bytestring. - -Taken from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/archlinux/svntogit-community/packages/trunk/cabal-install-base16-bytestring1.0.patch - -diff --git a/Distribution/Client/HashValue.hs b/Distribution/Client/HashValue.hs -index 54b8aee9e..11e647c1c 100644 ---- a/Distribution/Client/HashValue.hs -+++ b/Distribution/Client/HashValue.hs -@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ -+{-# LANGUAGE CPP #-} - {-# LANGUAGE DeriveDataTypeable #-} - {-# LANGUAGE DeriveGeneric #-} - module Distribution.Client.HashValue ( -@@ -72,10 +73,14 @@ hashFromTUF (Sec.Hash hashstr) = - --TODO: [code cleanup] either we should get TUF to use raw bytestrings or - -- perhaps we should also just use a base16 string as the internal rep. - case Base16.decode (BS.pack hashstr) of -+#if MIN_VERSION_base16_bytestring(1,0,0) -+ Right hash -> HashValue hash -+ Left _ -> error "hashFromTUF: cannot decode base16" -+#else - (hash, trailing) | not (BS.null hash) && BS.null trailing - -> HashValue hash - _ -> error "hashFromTUF: cannot decode base16 hash" -- -+#endif - - -- | Truncate a 32 byte SHA256 hash to - -- -- cgit v1.2.3